Total War: Warhammer 2 is great. The Creative Assembly has elegantly streamlined the game, introduced an excellent new campaign structure and done a tremendous job of realising four exciting factions from the OTT world of Warhammer. We like it so much we gave it 92 in our review. Total War: WARHAMMER II is a strategy game of titanic proportions. Choose from four unique, varied factions and wage war your way – mounting a campaign of.

1. Is Total War Warhammer 2 Multiplayer

Originally posted by:well, free for all is a fun 20 minutes to spend fighting with your friends, but in regards to co-op, sadly it's still just 2 Free for all campaign? I am talking only about the campaign map, not the 'Scenarios' where you just make an army and fight eachother. Yeah, just MP battle FFA sorry.No, only 2 player co ophere's a question, why does the minor multiplayer aspect affect your decision to by a predominantly single player game. It's like buying CS:GO for the hydra ops campaign. Originally posted by:Free for all campaign? I am talking only about the campaign map, not the 'Scenarios' where you just make an army and fight eachother.

Yeah, just MP battle FFA sorry.No, only 2 player co ophere's a question, why does the minor multiplayer aspect affect your decision to by a predominantly single player game. It's like buying CS:GO for the hydra ops campaign. That's an extremely terrible comparation. It is a predominantly singleplayer game, yeah, but don't tell me you never wanted it to really support more than 2 player seets in the multiplayer section.The picture of you and other 3+ people fighting eachother, or alongside eachother in this game? I mean, why wouldn't I want that? That's a dumb question. Originally posted by:yeah, just MP battle FFA sorry.No, only 2 player co ophere's a question, why does the minor multiplayer aspect affect your decision to by a predominantly single player game.

It's like buying CS:GO for the hydra ops campaign. That's an extremely terrible comparation. It is a predominantly singleplayer game, yeah, but don't tell me you never wanted it to really support more than 2 player seets in the multiplayer section.The picture of you and other 3+ people fighting eachother, or alongside eachother in this game? I mean, why wouldn't I want that? That's a dumb question.

Long wait times between turns?It's a fun conept, but I know that in reality it just wouldn't work out. Do you understand how easy it would be for CA to simply make it available, but haven't? There must be a valid reason why, because it would literally require CA minimal effort while satisfying thousands of players.

Originally posted by:Free for all campaign? I am talking only about the campaign map, not the 'Scenarios' where you just make an army and fight eachother. Yeah, just MP battle FFA sorry.No, only 2 player co ophere's a question, why does the minor multiplayer aspect affect your decision to by a predominantly single player game.

It's like buying CS:GO for the hydra ops campaign.actually, in all the historical total wars, the majority of the hours I've put in were coop with irl friends since this is the one series of games we all enjoy. There are 3 of us, and only 2 people for coop so someone is always left out. Considering how fast warhammer turns go by, I wouldn't mind if they let us coop or versus or free for all a 4 player campaign, even with all the disconnects, bugs, and waiting for others we all know happens in coop.

Originally posted by:That's an extremely terrible comparation. It is a predominantly singleplayer game, yeah, but don't tell me you never wanted it to really support more than 2 player seets in the multiplayer section.The picture of you and other 3+ people fighting eachother, or alongside eachother in this game? I mean, why wouldn't I want that? That's a dumb question.

Long wait times between turns?It's a fun conept, but I know that in reality it just wouldn't work out. Do you understand how easy it would be for CA to simply make it available, but haven't? There must be a valid reason why, because it would literally require CA minimal effort while satisfying thousands of players. In all honesty, they could've done better even by letting players to all make their decisions in one round, ready up, and when they all readied up, the round would pass.Same thing as in Civ for example.If CA tried, they would make it. But why would they put extra time, money or effort into that? If it sells as always. Originally posted by:long wait times between turns?It's a fun conept, but I know that in reality it just wouldn't work out.

Do you understand how easy it would be for CA to simply make it available, but haven't? There must be a valid reason why, because it would literally require CA minimal effort while satisfying thousands of players. In all honesty, they could've done better even by letting players to all make their decisions in one round, ready up, and when they all readied up, the round would pass.Same thing as in Civ for example.If CA tried, they would make it. But why would they put extra time, money or effort into that? If it sells as always.

Is Total War Warhammer 2 Multiplayer

Same goes for FLC though, yet look at the effort CA put into Brettonia. Originally posted by:In all honesty, they could've done better even by letting players to all make their decisions in one round, ready up, and when they all readied up, the round would pass.Same thing as in Civ for example.If CA tried, they would make it. But why would they put extra time, money or effort into that?

If it sells as always.It's actually extremely simple to find out why they don't put more effort into the multiplayer campaign and multiplayer in general. All you have to do is look at the achievement stats for the first game. Only 23% of it's playerbase ever started a co-op campaign and out of that only 2.9% ever actually won one. So yeah, people who buy these games don't really care about multiplayer, why should CA in something only a 'small' part of their playerbase ever uses? Even if only a third player can join, that would make a huge difference as far as I'm concerned.

The way Co-op works right now, you have to play the same type of faction. I think the lizardmen and Norsca are the only ones that only have two of their faction type, so playing three together really isn't hindered that much. I think it'd be worth it.

And if CA is worried about cost effectivness, then maybe add it as a DLC for a few dollars or something. Those that want to have a third player would be willing to pay it if it's not too expensive, including myself.

Contents.Total War: WARHAMMER – Update 2Due Live on 28/07/16Update 2 is designed to add further polish and tweaks, fixes some notable gameplay issues and brings our second pass at unit rebalancing. Some notable changes include UI scaling for high-resolution displays, performance enhancements and visual improvements for NVIDIA users, and the introduction of the new Siege Attacker trait, enabling armies with Siege Attacker units to immediately initiate sieges without building dedicated siege equipment.A huge level of customisation is now available in Custom and Multiplayer battles. When building your army you can now choose individual spells, items and abilities for your characters. These additions will increase their cost, but provide a level of granularity, individuality, and can skew their battlefield role to suit your playstyle.New ContentA host of new free content is made available via this update, including the Empire Amber Wizard hero, The Lore of Beasts, The Beastmen as new and terrifying AI-opponent in the Grand Campaign, and four new Custom and Multiplayer battle maps.

Sarthorael The Everchosen, the Chaos Lord of Change, is also now available to use as a Legendary Lord in custom and multiplayer battles.